It’s convenient for Businesses to use a part of the resources they allocate for CSR or R&D into the support of new ventures or a deeper market analysis. This project aims to be a self-sustained Nonprofit at a global scale!

It generalize the approaces that some Solve MIT innovators submittd, like: DemocracyLab to make invisible startups shine; Momentum and RETOS to engage citizens about their city problems; Suapon, RISE Circular Board Alice and Blossom Academy so any student can have multicultural inspiration and p2p learning without traveling. All in one, they can use it to make everyone aware of the other one advantages or possibilities (like a cross-marketing)!

Key Resources
-Open exchange of knowledge to solve unresolved issues together, at local or global scale
Key Activities
-Management of global brainstorming for Open Innovation
for Communities and businesses
-Crowdfunding aggregateor for new startups
-Automate precise market analysis and customer research and acquisition
-Text analysis for moderation
and segment of content
Value Proposition
-Crowd collect most pressing problems so they can be solved by infallible startups to anyone
-Showcase best ideas or solutions
-Customers gain trust and choose directly which activity to support and discover faster
-Free mentoring/tuition and best free online courses (even available offline)
-Improve management of citizens microcommunities who can tap on global knowledge
-no one left behind” for real, even the poorest if he can access the web
Beneficiary Segment
-Who post a problem can become client or member of a startup thet solve it
-Who don’t know new smarter practices
-Aspirant startuppers who search for ideation or validation can anull the risk of launch
-Freelancers who want to improve their authority or join a startup
-People who can’t pay for education but can access the Internet (maybe in GWhubs)
-Any nonprofit or NGO tha serves marginalized people, so they can learn a job for free or cheaper
Customer Relationship
-Online platform
-Email or social media
-co-creation of value with the community
-p2p personal assistance
Partners + Key Stakeholders
-Incubators and businesses around startups growth
-Problems/Ideas/Solutions publishers (anyone or professionals, businesses and researchers)
-Courses Content Curators/ Creators
-Human content moderators
-Open Innovation Promoters in Joint Ventures
Channels
-Proietary platforms
-Phisical GWhubs
-Social Media
Customer Segment
-Stratuppers that created their Value Proposition, Team, skill training and initial founding on the platform
-Business owners who can easily find Validation, increase audience perfectly segmented and be spotted if they highlight their sustainability practices. Much time and resourses saved
-Corporations who need Distributed Open Innovation
-Incubators who search for structured statups
Cost Structure
-Web hosting of the platforms
-Digital Payment method for crowdfunding money exchange
-GWhubs structures
-Artificial Intelligence improvement
Surplus
-Invest on key partners for circularity
Impact Measures
-New employment rate of the members who didn’t have a job yet
Revenue
-fee from:
–incubators who host newly formed startups
–businesses who ask for Open Innovation
–analytics on platform data
–crowdfunding from private to the startups

To simplify the structure of the previous Canva, we present the PEST and SWOT analysis:

PEST analysis

Political:
-Solve problems with logic ideas that don’t belong to a precise political ideology
-International legislation improvements
-Fight home market lobbying/pressure groups creating Innovation from the Crowd
-Help people prisoners of wars and conflicts if they have internet access
Economic:
-home and overseas economy situation and trends analysis in one place, exactly quantified and clearly expressed
-Can create market and trade cycles by specific industry factors
-Has many customer/end-user drivers (to be consumer or producers of ideas and educational content)
Social:
-Intercept and aim to concretely improve lifestyle trends by collecting needs and make them solved by collectivity
-Demographics is wide, only babies and digital-illiterate are excluded
-Empower consumer attitudes and opinions to global level
-Independent from law changes affecting social factors
-Brands and companies are incentivized to publish their Benefit Corporation values (Sustainability, ecology, social attention in all their processes)
-Nowadays Corporate Social Responsability and other social impacts of Enterprises are crucial for customers
-Consumers buying patterns are the collected data, so new businesses can use them to launch or grow
-It influences majorly the exponential increment of job opportunities and education access or free tuition
-It’s totally inclusive, any religion or ethnic is appreciated and incentivized on being shared to add different points of view
-No ethical issues
Technology:
-Use mature web technologies and leverage distributed internet connection
-Simple technology with reinvented use for GWtS (without Blockchain integration); basic tech for GuruWorld notification answering, complex use of Big Data analysis in the future
-Consumer produce feedbacks on posts and take advantage of the informations he sees. Incubators “buy” the team that decide to create a startup and give to the platform a part of the money they invest in the newly formed venture
-Technology is extremely Accessible
-There’re no licencing and patents involved
-Intellectual property issues are for who posts patentable ideas. The first who posts and demonstrate that there’s no references on the internet is allowed to be protected and recognized the inventor and owner of the patent
-Global communications are supported

SWOT analysis

Strengths:
-Near to global empowerment from scratch: anyone could learn a job and have solid and low risk opportunities to create stable StartUps
-Most pressing problems are solved in the most sustainble, creative and optimized way
-Enterprises can improve their value chain with Benefit Corporation characteristics with a true and massive Open Innovation
-Potentially easy method to fight poverty and educational gaps
Weaknesses:
-Don’t have great incomes if not many problems are addressed with the launch of StartUps
-The greatest beneficiaries (poor people) are the ones who have difficulty on having or using the internet, local help has an high cost
-Many volunteers are needed
Opportunities:
-Increasing use of social media and massive open online courses
-People can solve or find tricks on most pressing problems and find new jobs directly from Smartphones on GWtS
-Anyone could learn trending skills or having tuition for free if many users contribute to answer easy or parts of GuruWorld-students questions
Threats:
-Expense of running media ads and large databases and Big Data analysis
-Low measurable impact for who don’t grow step by step in the platform but steal ideas and replicate/adapt them in their activity without notifying

To make this possible, the costs of ICT architecture like the main social media have to be covered.

It’s also like a Self-help + Asset Model: Social service is available for the target group with the hope of their own means, productive input, satisfy their own need + target employed to produce commercial products for customers because they have special capabilities.

Like poor receive education and Social Enterprise would acquire long-term offers (give jobs, ..) making unemployed to work or teach to somebody else.

Users have only to receive value (best methods, product indication or job education and opportunity) and provide feedbacks, votes or answers. So the only source of money can come from Enterprises (or StartUp incubators) that take advantage of the platform.

Joining in squads that decide to concretize certain proposed ideas from a thread, startuppers can be ready for valuable incubation in dedicated structures. A part of the services they give can translate in a monetary offer to the platform.

Those can contribute in multiple ways:

  • paying to post a challenge, so they can do open innovation at a global scale and assume/reward who contribute the most
  • paying to be promoted (if BCorps or certified like that after the open innovation path) around their locality and scale always bigger or in their specific category
  • if they’re born from the platform, they can voluntary donate a monthly or annual fee

So, earnings will come from the businesses that are around the ecosystem:

  • startups that born from the meeting of their squad members on the threads; 
  • incubators in every locality of the world for start-ups that establish in their geographic area;
  • any business that want to integrate new sustainable practices using a real global open innovation